Home / Lifestyle / Why we need an inquiry into the death of Michael Collins

Why we need an inquiry into the death of Michael Collins

By S M Sigerson
When he was shot in 1922, Michael Collins was poised to lead Ireland into a new era of national reconstruction. There is little doubt that his loss changed forever the young nation’s formative development, yet no record of any official inquiry into his death has come down to us. We still don’t know what happened. Who was responsible? It’s time for a full public inquiry so we can discover the truth.
Michael Collins -  why we need an investigation into his death
The year: 1922. Against all odds, beyond the rebels’ “wildest dreams in 1916,” the mighty British Empire has capitulated. Independence, which the moral force of a small nation had long since won on paper, was now to become a reality. In six years, a virtual handful of gunmen had wrested it from a superior British military presence, which outnumbered them ten to one.
Michael Collins, youthful head-centre of the Irish Republican Brotherhood, chief strategist of these insurgents, was also an elected representative of the new, native government: member for South Cork, Minister of Finance and Director of Intelligence.
Conscripted to lead peace negotiations, he is also dead centre of ensuing controversy over the resulting Treaty. Although granting much that Ireland “had wanted these past seven hundred years,” the Treaty controversy turns to conflict, and conflict to civil war. A band of brothers is shattered into fraternal violence.
In August, Collins is on a short tour of his own county of Cork. Cheering crowds surround him at every stop. He assures friends, family, comrades, who greet him everywhere, “T’will soon be over … ” And confides to local commanders, “I’m going to put an end to this bloody war as quickly as possible.”
On a lonely road in West Cork, his own home territory … shots ring out. His military escort returns with just one casualty: the Commander-in-Chief himself. The man of the hour. The one the nation trusted; whom some have called “the most important man in Ireland.”
Why was he there? What was the purpose of his visit to Cork? Whom did he meet with? What was the name of each man in his escort? What did they say about the ambush? Was there an official inquest into his death? If so, what were its findings?
This is the sort of information one would expect to find at one’s fingers’ ends, on the first page of official records; certainly where the violent death of a nation’s Commander-in-Chief is concerned.
Yet over ninety years later, such questions have yet to be fully answered. No public inquiry was ever conducted. A few news clippings, wild rumours, secret testimony about burned files, … These are all we have to rely on; reducing the nation’s most disastrous loss of that period to little more than a folktale.
Some claim that a private inquest was held by the government or by the army at the time. If so, it was without the benefit of eye-witness testimony. “None of the escort with whom I spoke were questioned in any formal way or asked to attend an inquiry,” wrote John M Feehan, one of the greatest authorities on the death of Collins.
What of his many biographers? Certainly we have only them to thank for such studies as have been made. Understandably, many chroniclers have tended to stick with questions they can answer; and to pass over those which prove hopelessly perplexing. This may be the most practical approach, for shorthand accounts in history books, film, documentary, and speeches.

The Assassination of Michael Collins by S M Singerson
The Assassination of Michael Collins by S M Singerson
But the devil is in the detail. Just one of those present when Collins died tends to be the most often quoted: Emmett Dalton of Collins’ convoy. As Free State general in charge of Cork, this was the one most personally responsible for the Commander-in-Chief’s safety there that day.
Yet many who were present at the ambush survived to tell their tale. Testimony from a number of these men, from both sides, has come down to us, however informally. They have one thing in common: practically every one contradicts Dalton’s version of what happened.
Still, can we call them witnesses? A witness is an uninvolved spectator, who can report what they saw, with some objectivity. As far as we know, the only ones present at Collins’ death were members of the Free State convoy, and the anti-Treaty ambushers. No one else was there. These were the participants, whose actions are in question. So none of them can be considered entirely disinterested.
Still, taken as a whole, they make one most telling point: no two accounts agree. Each and every one contradicts the others about what happened. And it is Dalton’s version which differs most widely from almost all others, on key points.
There is much to be learned from Michael Collins’ fate. Much which we have as yet failed to understand; a critical lesson of our history that’s been missed.
There is so much that could be done in this case now. Modern scholarship, forensic science, full disclosure of all relevant historical records, long hidden from public access, could enable us to clear up many questions, which have hung in the air since the day he fell.
As we look forward to the centenary of his death in 2022, it is to be hoped that the many people and institutions needed will rise to the occasion to carry this out, with the kind of complete, selfless cooperation called for.
S M Sigerson is the author of “The Assassination of Michael Collins: What Happened At Béal na mBláth?” Available online www.amazon.com/dp/1493784714 or ask at your local bookshop.
© 2014 S M Sigerson
History

Follow the Irish History Bitesize Facebook page

More on Irish history

About Andrew Moore

Check Also

Catholic school accused of discriminating against non-religious children

A Roman Catholic school in Ireland has been accused of discrimination after it allowed ‘homework …

9 comments

  1. There are many who believe that Ireland would have remained in the grasp of the UK if it were up to Collins??? He did want the war over and seemed willing to compromise. So many stories and so many different versions.

  2. He deserved to die for signing away the North. If we hadn’t killed him, there’d still be a black mark against West Cork people. Think he would have signed Munster away?

  3. The Brits where never going let Collins live after the carnage he lay on them and they had informers among Collins own who would have carried back the info that Collins would support the struggle to take the North through supply of arms etc.The doubt also is that he was shot by a sniper from above after breaking cover which any military person would not do while being covered by sniper fire from above.The others with Collins on the day are suspected of shooting him with a revolver as he took cover from fire If they have an inquiry and exhume his body the truth will be told by the ballistic test on the round that killed him from three feet away not from top of a hill with a 308 rifle which if had been the weapon his head would have been blown to bits and a revolver shot from top of a hill would never be accurate or lethal at distance.

  4. I’d like to thank everyone who posted these very intelligent comments on this article. You’ve clearly done your homework on this vital history. Would love to hear your thoughts on the book “The Assassination of Michael Collins: What Happened at Beal na mBlath?” http://www.amazon.com/dp/1493784714

  5. Ann Gerety Smyth

    I think the answer is probably documented in British Intelligence documents.

  6. Pamela Harrison

    From all i have read on Michael Collins,I think dev had him shot, no secret he was jealous of Collins.reason why he sent him to England knowing full well Collins couldn’t bring back the 32county,used as a scape goat and no one in British army etc new what he looked like till dev sent him to England to sign treaty.Why did dev do when he was president??nothing did he get 32county No.i believe Collins would of achieved it in time ,shame he was shot truly for the Irish people.

  7. De Valera was the instigatator behind Collins death. De Valera lacked personality and carisma. He sent Collins to the UK to sign the treaty which, if Collins hadn’t been excuted, would have lead to greater things. It was one stepping stone on the path by Collins towards greater things towards a free state Ireland. In my opinion deep down De Valera was jealous of Collins.He knew he’d never achieve anything so he sent Collins to the UK to sign that treaty. It was one of the sadest losses in the formation of our free state as Michael Collins was one of the greatest soldiers we ever had.

  8. Collins was killed by Emmet Dalton, Dalton was part of British Military Intelligence and so were a number of people in Collins escort, which for some strange reason he did not hand pick,the hat which Collins wore on the day has never been discovered, the one put on display was in fact Daltons hat, and why was his body brought to a British Military hospital? Dalton later rejoined the British Army, then went to America and returned to Ireland and formed Ardmore Film Studios in Bray Co. Wicklow

  9. i strongly believe that Michael was executed,and i believe de velara was behind it in some shape or form, its strange that he achieved nothing as president of ireland, he should not of sent michael to england to do a job that was or should of been his but instead he sent a scapegoat, so Collins took the rap and made de valera the hero, Collins war was,nt over when he signed that document, it was a chance to give him time to achieve a united ireland, just the same as sinn fein did, changing tactics to achieve a united ireland, which we are still waiting for.i dont condelm sinn fein for that but i welcome it, but they should,nt lambast brave men such as collins, and i would be proud to defend his name

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.