Ireland Calling
Ireland Calling Store

‘Framed’ Oliver Cromwell was honourable, says Irish historian

A new book that suggests that Oliver Cromwell was framed and was never as violent and destructive as generally thought is likely to cause a stir among Irish scholars and the general public.

Oliver Cromwell

Cromwell’s invasion of Ireland in 1649 led to the massacre of thousands of Irish civilians.

However, amateur Irish historian, Tom Reilly, believes Cromwell’s men didn’t intentionally harm any civilians at the Siege of Drogheda in September 1649. He first made the claim in a book he wrote 15 years ago. His views proved controversial and were largely dismissed by historians.

The widely accepted version of history is that Cromwell and his men killed thousands of Catholics in Ireland. He did this after distributing propaganda to the English public that suggested that several thousand English Protestants had been massacred by Irish Catholics.

Now, 15 years later after the first book, Reilly has written a follow-up that addresses some of the points his critics made last time around. He says: “A lot of the academic people who have made comments on it in the past, they are just wrong, it’s as simple as that.”

Reilly, who is from Drogheda and has studied local records, said: “Loads of names of people existed at that time who I was told shouldn’t exist because Cromwell killed them – it just didn’t make any sense.”

He suggests that Cromwell was made a scapegoat for the atrocities that did occur and the people really to blame were anti-Catholic members of the British parliament who were in power following the overthrowing of King Charles I. He accepts that his book is likely to upset quite a few people but said: “I’m not a Cromwell lover by any means but in my opinion he was upright and honourable.”

However, Joan Redmond, a PhD student in Cambridge, said that news-sheets had been distributed around England on Cromwell’s orders saying that thousands of British Protestants had been killed by the Irish in a bid to justify the attacks to the English public.

She also said that Cromwell was equally violent towards the English. She said: “He also had a few incidents in England where he stormed places, particularly where Catholic troops were holding down forts, and towns, and behaved violently there as well, this includes the storming of Basing House in Hampshire in 1645.”

However, Reilly remains adamant that Cromwell has been made the scapegoat for atrocities committed by others.

Sign up to our FREE newsletters

Please click on your confirmation email,
Check your junk mail folder in case it gets sent there.

4 thoughts on “‘Framed’ Oliver Cromwell was honourable, says Irish historian

  1. Jane McCarthy

    ‘Amateur’ is certainly the word for this west-Brit apologist. What’s he been smoking, anyway?

    26/02/2016 at 7:43 pm
  2. Alan

    So, did this guy actually beat my ancestor to death with his own wooden leg on the bridge in Drogheda or not General Aston was a good guy here?
    Did or did he not say to hell or to Connaught?
    Please stop talking nonsense!!

    25/02/2016 at 11:51 pm
  3. Joan Wanner

    Similar to saying, Saadam Hussein wasn’t such a bad guy for gasing all of the Kurds. They were his enemies in a time of war( Iraq-Iran War.) Its all relative and we all know, its the victor who gets to tell the story.

    25/02/2016 at 9:04 pm
  4. Shane O'Malley

    This guy is an amateur historian in more ways than one. Cromwell was criticised in England by groups like the levellers for his conduct in Ireland. This guy is trying to get noticed by saying something controversial. He has no honour.

    23/10/2015 at 10:43 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

XSLT Plugin by Leo Jiang